top of page

Why #ReformsInMOI Is About Trust, Not Policy

  • Writer: Sean
    Sean
  • Jan 21
  • 3 min read

Reforms are supposed to calm nerves. In Nigeria, they often do the opposite. The moment a ministry announces a “reform agenda,” the public response is rarely curiosity; it’s suspicion. Not because Nigerians don’t understand reform language—but because they’ve learned to read between the lines. The problem with #ReformsInMOI isn’t the policy itself. It’s the trust deficit surrounding it.


Here’s the uncomfortable truth: reforms no longer land on a neutral ground. They land on a field already bruised by broken promises, half-deliveries, and institutional fatigue.

In Nigeria, reforms don’t fail at the policy stage. They fail at the credibility stage.

This is the heart of why Nigerians don’t trust government reforms. People don’t doubt reforms because they hate change; they doubt them because they’ve survived too many versions of it.


#ReformsInMOI

 

Why Nigerians Don’t Trust Government Reforms — And Why #ReformsInMOI Is Different

Why Reform Language Triggers Suspicion

For years, Nigerians have heard the same words recycled with different logos.


“Restructuring.” “Overhaul.” “Renewed mandate.” “Strategic realignment.”


Each term arrives polished, but history has trained people to ask one question first: What’s the catch?


Reform-heavy messaging has become associated with three things:

  • New pain without visible relief

  • Promises that outlive the administration that made them

  • Policies that work on paper but collapse in practice


So when citizens hear “reform,” they don’t imagine improvement. They imagine adjustment costs—higher fees, tighter rules, longer queues, and more bureaucracy—without accountability.


That reaction isn’t cynicism. It’s pattern recognition.

 

Institutional Memory Is a Powerful Thing

Public trust doesn’t reset with each announcement. Nigerians carry institutional memory the way households carry scars from previous rent hikes or fuel increases. Every failed reform becomes a reference point for the next one.


When systems repeatedly malfunction—whether through corruption, inefficiency, or selective enforcement—citizens stop listening to intent and start watching outcomes. And once that switch flips, no press statement can reverse it overnight.

People don’t doubt reforms because they hate change. They doubt reforms because they’ve survived too many versions of it.

The result is a public that assumes reforms are either:

  • A cover for revenue extraction

  • A political box-ticking exercise

  • Or a temporary headline with no follow-through

 

The Communication Gap Nobody Wants to Admit

There’s also an emotional disconnect. Government communication often speaks at people, not with them. It explains systems but ignores experience.


While officials talk about frameworks and timelines, citizens are thinking about:

  • The last time a “reform” made daily life harder

  • The gap between official assurances and street reality

  • The absence of feedback when things go wrong


This gap creates a silent hostility. Not protest-level anger—but withdrawal. People stop engaging. They stop believing. They stop expecting better.


And once citizens disengage emotionally, even good reforms struggle to breathe.

 

Why Nigerians Now Judge Intent Before Content

This is the most critical shift. Nigerians no longer ask, “Is this reform smart?” They ask, “Who benefits first?”


Intent has become the filter through which policy is evaluated. Before reading details, people assess:

  • Timing: Why now?

  • Pattern: Who has done this before?

  • Consistency: Will this apply equally to everyone?


If intent feels unclear or self-serving, the policy loses legitimacy—even if it’s technically sound.

In today’s Nigeria, trust is the policy.

Without it, data doesn’t persuade. Explanations don’t calm fears. And urgency sounds like pressure, not leadership.

 

What Trust Repair Actually Requires

Trust cannot be announced. It has to be demonstrated, slowly and visibly.


Repair would require more than press releases or hashtags. It would mean:

  • Acknowledging past failures openly, not defensively

  • Showing early, tangible wins—not distant projections

  • Applying rules consistently, especially to insiders

  • Creating feedback loops that actually change outcomes


Most importantly, it would require patience. Trust grows when people see alignment between words and lived experience—over time, not overnight.

 

Why This Matters Beyond #ReformsInMOI

This isn’t just about one ministry or one policy direction. It’s about why reform conversations keep stalling across sectors.


Until credibility is rebuilt, even necessary reforms will face resistance—not because Nigerians are irrational, but because they are cautious. They’ve learned that survival often means skepticism.

Reforms don’t fail because Nigerians hate change. They fail because Nigerians have learned not to fall for slogans.

The challenge ahead isn’t to refine policy language. It’s to rebuild belief. And belief, unlike reform documents, can’t be fast-tracked.


Comments


bottom of page